The People Of UK Oppose 5G


While the topic is heavily debated, 5G technology is being installed in the United States but the UK is upholding a ban on the expanded telecommunications service. Studies out of India, Israel, and Germany show that 5G towers and infrastructure are harmful and will increase the health risks to human, animals, and agriculture. Reports from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) contradict these findings and insist that 5G is safe. The people of Bristol UK oppose 5G and it is likely that others will jump on the bandwagon as independent studies continue to surface.

What Is 5G?

5G (fifth generation) is another spectrum of radiation energy and is an expanded version of the internet, phone, and telecommunications services. Currently, more of the United States utilize 4G or 3G technology, which replaced 2G and analog, and 5G is already tested in specific metro areas.

5G will use up to 28GHz (powerful radio frequencies) and promises to increase connection speeds and make them faster. This can be beneficial for businesses or the self-employed who rely on their fast phone service for business; everyone will benefit from faster telecommunications.

The debate starts with the need for new 5G capable cell towers to be installed and in closer proximity to one another, which will ensure that promised speeds can be reached. This means normally where homes and schools would be apart from large cell phone towers, with 5G, towers will be telephone poles, the tops of elementary, junior and high schools (close to daycares), and other large buildings.

The Dangers Of 5G

Studies show that 5G will be detrimental to the health and wellbeing of those close to towers and those utilizing the cell service from radio frequency (RF) radiation exposures.

Representatives from 170 countries, which include: scientists, doctors, environmental organizations, and private citizens are calling for the immediate suspension of 5G tower installation via a petition “International Appeal: Stop 5G on Earth and Space”. This document includes almost 100,000 names.

Reports from those who signed this petition insist that there is evidence of damage to DNA, cells, and organs of plants and animals. They say that cases of cancer, heart disease, and diabetes will dramatically rise due to the “electromagnetic pollution” that 5G will create. 

To learn more about studies on radio frequencies and radiation health risks, you can visit these sites: Environmental Health Trust: and the Physicians for Safe Technology:

Why Brussels Is Already Banning 5G

Brussels states the pilot projects that have been launched, and subsequent tests, do not meet the radiation safety standards that have been imposed on the UK. Due to these standards, Minister Celine Femault said:

“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.”

Regardless of the benefits of 5G, the Minister has decided the benefits do not outweigh the risks and she refuses to make an exception to the standards that are in place.

Telecommunications companies are known to have strong lobbyists and with that comes money. While smaller countries are able to stave off those who fund these programs, countries like the United States allow legislation to be influenced by heavily funded lobbyists. In order to get a true reading on the risks of 5G, detrimental studies must surface in order to overturn the already begun advancement of this technology. Targets of having 5G available to 85% of the US, by the first half of the 2020-2030 decade, are in full effect.

Supporting these efforts are cell phone manufactures who are beginning to roll out upgraded models that use 5G technology. The cell phones currently used cannot work off 5G, however, new phones have been designed and developed and are already starting to hit the market. The production of faster phones is a hot sale for cell phone companies who stand to make billions off upgraded phone sales.

While Brussels has been able to ward off the installation of 5G infrastructure, the United States only seems to be ramping up the production of 5G cell towers and communications systems. Time will tell if Brussels was correct with not allowing the 5G technology because of grave concerns or if the United States are the victors in the battle. 


The people of Bristol and surrounding cities are speaking out.  To learn more about community information and gatherings, check out their Facebook pages here:

Bristol Residents Against 5G Technology-Take Action, Prevent the 5G Roll-out:

Halt 5G in the South West:

Stop 5G Bath:

We would like to give a warm “Thank You” to Bristol Residents Against 5G Technology-Take Action, Prevent the 5G Roll-out for allowing us to use a photo from an event in their area, and for their help in spreading awareness about 5G and possible health risks.

Security Alert: 5G Could Be Our Enemies’ Best Friend

Previous article

Firefighters In CA Get Exempt Status For 5G

Next article

You may also like


  1. Thank you for highlighting the work the British people are doing in regards to opposing 5G in their towns & cities. The Global roll-out is a crime against humanity – against all nature, all biology. No safety tests have been made on this technology, nor the compounding effects of RF exposure from 2G, 3G, 4G & 5G combined. ‘Safety guidelines’ are owned by Industry and are set thousands to millions of times above what is considered safe by Independent studies. It is imperative that everyone wake-up and speak about this – contact your local MPs and councillors. We simply cannot allow the telecom industries to subject us to dangerous levels of radiation (non-ionising radiation is harmful) It time for humanity to stand up and say “ENOUGH” – enough of the greed, the lies. the suppressed studies. We have a right to live in a non-toxic environment. We have a right to choose to live in safe cities and homes. Humanity for safe progress and safe technology that causes no short or long term harm .

    1. Thank you for your warm and informative comment. The British people are showing the world a good example of what people can do to help spread awareness about 5G and the health risks.

  2. Only just found you from a link re. Insurance on Stop5G FB page, Dutch based but lots of US participation. Clicked the link to this article which I’m afraid is inaccurate. There is no “ban on the expanded telecommunications service” .
    Our govt. is blinded by the revenue and the captured-by-industry ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines which are followed by Public Health England (the UK’s CDC & FCC combined).
    ICNIRP is a Germay based NGO whose links to the industry they are supposed to police have been shown. They also have a disclaimer on their website – “ICNIRP e.V. undertakes all reasonable measures to ensure the reliability of information presented on the website, but does not guarantee the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information and views published. The content of our website is provided to you for information only. We do not assume any responsibility for any damage, including direct or indirect loss suffered by users or third parties in connection with the use of our website and/or the information it contains, including for the use or the interpretation of any technical data, recommendations, or specifications available on our website.”
    In other words they are not prepared to be held accountable – how can we trust the guidance of any organisation that washes its hands in advance?
    I suspect by now that the US is seeing an increase in 5G enabled areas of illnesses that defy regular diagnosis, as is the case in Switzerland .
    In the UK there are clinics in hospitals, few as yet, investigating such symptoms, yet british medicine still denies the possibilty of EHS as anything other than a psychiatric disorder.
    You may know that there is a general election impending here (Dec.12) and all major parties have the promotion of 5G in their manifesto. Yes, there are many stop 5G social media pages with hundreds of thousands of members well aware of the existential threat presented by EMR and especially 5G but there is too much money involved for our govt., no matter its complexion, to deny Big Wireless. It will require a revolutionary view – there have been a few local councils that have declared a moratorium on 5G but, as in the US, central govt. has bypassed their authority rendering their opposition pointless.
    This may make you think I’m being negative but I’m a realist and it will take a severe hit on public health, as in Switzerland, before our public “servants” put health before wealth.

  3. There have been no safety trials carried out on 5G. Therefore no 5G until governments present the facts.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Community